Monday, June 13, 2022

The Mormon Church and the Black

The following is copied from a tract of the title name, and which I have no idea from where I acquired it. The block on the back where the organization would be noted has been totally whited out. However, there is a small line which says, “By Permission of CRI,” which I know is the Christian Research Institute.  At any rate, I do know the information is accurate and so I will publish this to once again prove just how racist the Latter-day Saints cult is. 


Note: A major flaw in these citations has to do with the “seed of Cain.” They claim that Ham’s wife was “Egyptus,” who was a descendant of Cain but no biblical evidence shows this and I think, if this was a fact, the Bible would have noted such. However, the Bible doesn’t so much as intimate or suggest in any way that the curse on Cain or Ham’s son was black skin. This idea is invented by Mormons for racist reasons. Additionally, the mark (not “curse”) on Cain is plainly just on him and not on his progeny! As well, Ham was never cursed—his son Canaan was! Additionally, Satan’s name was NEVER “Lucifer,” which is another proof against the legitimacy of the LDS.


==================================

For Nearly 140 years, Mormonism (the “Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) has taught that the black people are “inferior” and are “cursed” by God. The Mormon leaders who have taught these things in the name of Christianity are revered as “prophets, seers and revelators” by their Church, and their plain words about these cruel, unscriptural teachings remain for the world to judge.


However, in June 1978, Mormon leaders attempted to erase over a century of outside resentment with the announcement that “worthy” black persons could receive privileges and secret initiations which had always been denied them in Mormonism. This strange, unexpected turnabout came as Mormon leaders were planning to initiate their final drive to send their “missionaries” into the remaining lands of the world where Mormonism has been most resisted—particularly Africa. Surely, this cannot be mere coincidence. Nevertheless, the firm Mormon teaching that a whole race of people are “cursed with a black skin” for sins committed by them before they were born remains to this very day; no announcement or “revelation” has removed it.


The following quotations, taken from authoritative doctrinal writings and speeches by Mormon Prophets (their supreme earthly leaders) and Apostles, should serve as a sobering warning of the true nature of Mormonism—a religion which curses an entire people one day, and offers them greater “privileges” the next.


May true Christians beware of all such hypocrisy! 


[bold emphasis is added by the tract author]


BRIGHAM YOUNG, Second Prophet and President of the Mormon Church:


“I have never yet preached a sermon and sent it out to the children of men, that they may not call Scripture.” 

Journal of Discourses, Volume 13, page 95.


“You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly without the blessing of the intelligence that generally bestowed upon mankind. The first man that committed the odious crime of killing one of his brethren will be curse the longest of any one of the children of Adam. Cain slew his brother. Cain might have been killed, and that would have put a termination to that line of human beings. This was not to be, and the Lord put a mark on him, which is the flat nose and black skin. Trace mankind down to after the flood, and then another curse is pronounced upon the same race—that they should be the ‘servant of servants;’ and they will be, until that curse is removed; and the Abolitionists cannot help it, nor in the least alter that decree.”

Journal of Discourses, Volume 7, pages 290-291.


“In our first settlement in Missouri, it was said by our enemies that we intended to tamper with the slaves, not that we had any idea of the kind, for such a thing never entered our minds. We knew that the children of Ham were to be the ‘servant of servants,’ and no power under heaven could hinder it, so long as the Lord would permit them to welter under the curse, and those were know to be our religious views concerning them.”

Journal of Discourses, Volume 2, page 172.


“Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so.”

Journal of Discourses, Volume 10, page 110.


JOSEPH SMITH, First Prophet and President and Founder of the Mormon Church:


“Had I anything to do with the negro, I would confine them by strict laws to their own species, and put them on a national equalization.”

History of the Church, Volume 5, pages 218-219


BRUCE R. McCONKIE, of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles of the Mormon Church.


“Those who were less valiant in the pre-existence and who thereby had certain spiritual restrictions imposed upon them during mortality are know thus as the negroes. Such spirits are sent to earth though the lineage of Cain, the mark put upon him for his rebellion against God and his murder of Abel being a black skin…. Noah’s son Ham married Egyptus, a descendent of Cain, thus preserving the negro lineage through the Flood…. The negroes are not equal with other races where the receipt of certain spiritual blessings are concerned, particularly the priesthood and the temple blessings that flow therefrom, but this inequality is not of man’s origin. It is the Lord’s doing, based on His eternal laws of justice, and grows out of the lack of spiritual valiance of those concerned in their first estate.”

Mormon Doctrine, 10th printing, pages 527-528.


Racial degeneration, resulting in differences in appearance and spiritual aptitude, has arisen since the fall. We know the circumstances under which the posterity of Cain (and later of Ham) were cursed with what we call negroid racial characteristics.”

Mormon Doctrine, page 616.


“Though he was a rebel and an associate of Lucifer in the pre-existence, and though he was a liar from the beginning whose name was Perdition, Cain managed to attain the privilege of mortal birth… As a result of his rebellion, Cain was cursed with a dark skin; he became the father of the Negroes, and those spirits who are not worthy to receive the priesthood are born through his lineage. He became the first mortal to be cursed as a son of perdition.” 

Mormon Doctrine, page 109.


“Through Ham (a name meaning black)[WRONG—it means “hot” or “warm”], ‘the blood of the Canaanites was preserved’ through the flood, he having married Egyptus, a descendant of Cain…. Negroes are thus descendants of Ham, who himself also was cursed, apparently for marrying into the forbidden lineage.”

Mormon Doctrine, page 343.


“….in a broad general sense, caste systems have their root and origin in the gospel itself, and when they operated according to the divine decree, the resultant restrictions and segregation are right and proper and have the approval of the Lord. To illustrate: Cain, Ham, and the whole negro race have been cursed with a black skin, the mark of Cain, so they can be identified as a caste apart, a people with whom the other descendants of Adam should not intermarry.”

Mormon Doctrine, page 114.


JOSEPH FIELDING SMITH, Tenth Prophet and President of the Mormon Church.


“I would not want you to believe that we bear any animosity toward the Negro. ‘Darkies’ are wonderful people, and they have their place in our church.”

Look magazine, October 22, 1963, page 79.


There is a reason why one man is born black and with other disadvantages, while another is born white with great advantages. The reason is that we once had an estate before we came here, and were obedient, more or less, to the laws that were given us there. Those who were faithful in all things there received greater blessings here, and those who were not faithful received less…. There were no neutrals in the war in heaven. All took sides either with Christ or with Satan. Ever man had his agency there, and men receive rewards here based upon their actions there, just as they will receive rewards hereafter for deeds done in the body. The Negro, evidently, is receiving the reward he merits.

Doctrines of Salvation, Volume 1, pages 66-67.


“President Brigham Young, answering a question put to him by Elder Lorenzo D. Young in a meeting held December 25, 1869, in Salt Lake City, said that Joseph Smith had declared that the negroes were not neutral in heaven, for all the spirits took sides, but the posterity of Cain are black because he (Cain) committed murder.”

The Way to Perfection, Pages 105-106.


“The negro race, for instance, have been placed under restrictions because for their attitude in the world of spirits, few will doubt. It cannot be looked upon as just that they should be deprived of the power of the Priesthood without it being a punishment for some act, or acts, performed before they were born.

The Way to Perfection, page 43.


“Not only was Cain called upon to suffer, but because of his wickedness he became the father of an inferior race. A curse was place upon him and that curse has been continued through his lineage and must do so while time endures. Millions of souls have come into this world cursed with a black skin and have been denied the privilege of Priesthood and the fulness of the blessings of the Gospel. These are the descendants of Cain. Moreover, they have been made to feel their inferiority and have been separated from the rest of mankind from the beginning….we will also hope that blessings may eventually be given to our negro brethren, for they are our brethren—children of God—not withstanding their black covering emblematic of eternal darkness.

The Way to Perfection, pages 101-102.


“Ham, through Egyptus, continued the curse which was placed upon the seed of Cain. Because of that curse this dark race was separated and isolated from the rest of Adam’s posterity before the flood, and since that time the same condition has continued, and they have been ‘despised among all people.’ This doctrine did not originate with Brigham Young but was taught by the Prophet Joseph Smith …. we all know it is due to his teachings that the negro today is bared from the Priesthood.”

The Way to Perfection, pages 110-111.


JOHN TAYLOR, Third Prophet and President of the Mormon Church.


“….after the flood we are told that the curse that had been pronounced upon Cain was continued through Ham’s wife, as he had married a wife of that seed. And why did it pass through the flood? Because it was necessary that the devil should have a representation upon the earth as well as God;….” 

Journal of Discourses, Volume 22, page 304.


“When he [Satan] destroyed the inhabitants of the antediluvian worlds, he suffered a descendant of Cain to come through the flood in order that he might be properly represented upon the earth.”

Journal of Discourses, Volume 23, page 336.


ORSON PRATT, of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles of the Mormon Church.


“….among the Saints is the most likely place for the [pre-existent] spirits to take their tabernacles, through a just and righteous parentage…. The Lord has not kept them in store for five or six thousand years past, and kept them waiting for their bodies all this time to send them among the Hottentots, the African negroes, the idolatrous Hindoos, or any other of the fallen nations of the earth. They are not kept in reserve in order to come forth to receive such a degraded parentage upon the earth; no, the Lords not such a being.”

Journal of Discourses, Volume 1, page 6.


MARK E. PETERSON, of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles of the Mormon Church.


“Who placed the Negroes originally in the darkest Africa? Was it some man, or was it God? And when He placed them there. He segregated them…. The Lord segregated the people both as to blood and place of residence. At least in the cases of the Lamanites and the negroes we have the definite word of the Lord Himself that He placed a dark skin upon them as a curse—as a punishment and as a sign to all others. He forbade intermarriage with them under the threat of extension of the curse ….And He certainly segregated the descendants of Cain when He cursed the Negro as to the Priesthood, and drew an absolute line. You may even say He dropped an Iron curtain there. The Negro was cursed as to the Priesthood, and therefore, was cursed as to the blessings of the Priesthood. Certainly God made a segregation there.


“Think of the Negro, cursed as to the Priesthood. Are we prejudiced against him? Unjustly, sometimes we are accused of having such a prejudice. But what does the mercy of God have for him? This Negro, who, in the pre-existence lived the type of life which justified the Lord in sending him to the earth in the lineage of Cain with a black skin, and possibly being born in darkest Africa—if that Negro is willing when he hears the gospel to accept it, he may have many the blessings of the gospel. In spite of all he did in the pre-existent life, the Lord is willing, if the Negro accepts the gospel with real, sincere faith, and is really converted, to give him the blessings of baptism and the gift of the Holy Ghost….


“If I were to marry a Negro woman and have children by her, my children would all be cursed as to the priesthood. Do I want my children cursed as to the priesthood? If there is one drop of negro blood in my children, as I have read to you, they receive the curse. There isn’t any argument, therefore, as to inter-marriage with the Negro, is there? There are 50 million Negroes in the United States. If they were to achieve complete absorption with the white race, think what that would do. With 50 million Negroes inter-married with us, where would the priesthood be? Who could hold it, in all America? Think what that would do to the work of the Church!….


Now we are generous with the Negro. We are willing that the Negro have the highest kind of education. I would be willing to let every Negro drive a Cadillac if they could afford it. I would be willing that they have all the advantages they can get out of life in the world. But let them enjoy these things among themselves. I think the Lord segregated the Negro and who is man to change that segregation?”


Race Problems—As They Affect the Church (address given at Brigham Young University)

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Christianity, Racism, and Slavery:

Many southern Christians felt that slavery, in one Baptist minister’s words, “stands as an institution of God.” Here are some common arguments made by Christians at the time:

Biblical Reasons
• Abraham, the “father of faith,” and all the patriarchs held slaves without God’s disapproval (Gen. 21:9–10).

• Canaan, Ham’s son, was made a slave to his brothers (Gen. 9:24–27).

• The Ten Commandments mention slavery twice, showing God’s implicit acceptance of it (Ex. 20:10, 17).

• Slavery was widespread throughout the Roman world, and yet Jesus never spoke against it.

• The apostle Paul specifically commanded slaves to obey their masters (Eph. 6:5–8).

• Paul returned a runaway slave, Philemon, to his master (Philem. 12).

Charitable and Evangelistic Reasons
• Slavery removes people from a culture that “worshipped the devil, practiced witchcraft, and sorcery” and other evils.

• Slavery brings heathens to a Christian land where they can hear the gospel. Christian masters provide religious instruction for their slaves.

• Under slavery, people are treated with kindness, as many northern visitors can attest.

• It is in slaveholders’ own interest to treat their slaves well.

• Slaves are treated more benevolently than are workers in oppressive northern factories.

Social Reasons
• Just as women are called to play a subordinate role (Eph. 5:22; 1 Tim. 2:11–15), so slaves are stationed by God in their place.

• Slavery is God’s means of protecting and providing for an inferior race (suffering the “curse of Ham” in Gen. 9:25 or even the punishment of Cain in Gen. 4:12).

• Abolition would lead to slave uprisings, bloodshed, and anarchy. Consider the mob’s “rule of terror” during the French Revolution.

Political Reasons
• Christians are to obey civil authorities, and those authorities permit and protect slavery.

• The church should concentrate on spiritual matters, not political ones.

• Those who support abolition are, in James H. Thornwell’s words, “atheists, socialists, communists [and] red republicans.”

(From Christianity Today: Why Did So Many Christians Support Slavery)

Colonial American Christianity predominately preached, and supported Slavery and the enslavement of African Americans. Many well, and elite, educated preachers and pastors promoted slavery, condemned the African American race, held to the doctrine and teaching of the curse of Ham and Cain.

You hold to an American Christian thought that is deeply rooted in Racism.

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

Anonymous (I find that usually those who post as "anonymous" are cowards.

First, This article is about the LDS and RACISM!! Not just slavery, but RACISM.

Second: Only SOME Christians supported slavery, and it was those who did NOT obey God and were also racists, considering black people as lesser humans.

Third, anyone doing a bit of research would learn the the slave of Israel were not treated as lesser humans, and were actually required to be released, if I remember correctly without looking it up, after 7 years. As well, their slave were captives from wars, as were most slaves during those days.

Only ignorant so-called Christians claim black are lesser humans with the "curse of Ham" (Ham was never cursed--it was his son, but there is no mention of skin color).

Paul said to return to masters because that was the law of the time and Christians are to obey the law of the land unless it conflicts with God's law in some way. However, notice Paul also taught the gospel to slaves or had others do so. Again, these slaves were not given the harsh treatment as were the slaves in the South.

If you ever actually study the Bible you will see that God allows things without approving it, such as polygamy (which violates the original idea of marriage), but just because it isn't discussed that doesn't mean God "implicity" approves it--Don't read your ideas into the Scripture.

Those REAL Christians who weren't taught falsely about the black race are the ones who fought to end slavery and it was the TRUE Christian church which caused the end of slavery, first by getting the end of slave trading and then ending slavery itself.

SO you demonstrate that not only do you not understand Scripture and true Christian teachings, nor have you studied much history.

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

Cowardly anonymous Mormon,

I do NOT allow foul language to be posted in comments, no will I do the work it takes to copy and cut and past your comment without the language (which shows your lack of command of the English language). However I will respond this last time to demonstrate how foolish you are.

The doctrine of the authentic Church of Jesus Christ is spelled out in the Bible. Nowhere is racism justified in the Bible. Meanwhile, racism IS a doctrine of the LDS, a doctrine which they want to pretend never existed. I don’t personally have any racist history because I was never racist.

Any true Christian who is racist is violating God’s laws. Any Mormon who is racist is following historical LDS doctrines.

Nowhere do I minimize racism by so-called Christians and I do denounce those who claim the name of Christ and yet are racists.

I “detest” the LDS faith because it is an un-godly cult which worships a different god and a different Jesus, a cult in which no one is saved and those who die as Mormons will spend everlasting live in HELL. I “detest” it because it is used by Satan to keep people away from salvation in the true Jesus of the Bible.

The real church of Christ had no racist support for slavery. Individuals claiming the name of Christ may have done so but that isn’t the teaching of the Christian faith.

Again, it was Christians who centuries ago fought slavery and eventually got it abolished.

Again, you have proven your ignorance of the real Church as well as history in general. If you had done just the least bit of historical research of you church you would know it was a fraud from the beginning.

For those who want to deny the racist teaching of the LDS, I direct them to this post as just one example how endemic racism is to the LDS:
https://watchmanvlds.blogspot.com/2014/12/mormonism-racist-religion.html

Anonymous said...

Reading through your post, going to the original article you appeared to link to appears to have struck a cord with someone. I am not sure who that anonymous person is - however, it seems there is some anger and hostility with you and that individual.

I also happened to come across this recent article on someone's website where they link to your post here, and the other post you provided a URL for.

You may want to see what this person has to say because he does appear to provide a good explanation for the issues you bring up. Addressing the Misplaced Condemnation of Racism in Early Latter-day Saint Teaching and History

I'd be curious as to your response to what this person has to say.

By the way - I am choosing to remain anonymous as I have recently left the Church and am struggling in my own right and don't want to be publicly known for it. Hope you understand.

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

Anonymous 8/7,

That "individual" was an angry and nasty person, who claimed I was "detesting" the LDS, which is why I used the word "detest" (with the quotes) in my response. I hold no "deeply rooted spirt of anger," but Mormons always claim their opposition is angry; after all, how could anyone oppose the LDS if they aren't angry?

The author of the article to which you link is obviously the angry anonymous, and notice what a wonderful representative he is of his cult by making fun of my name--very much like a child would do.

Everything on that post is what my response is. He lies when he writes I published "false and dishonest information." Everything I published about the LDS is 100% true and the evidence is cited and available to any researcher.

Unlike what he intimates, I don't/didn't bring up the racism issue to attempt proving the LDS isn't a true faith; I only point out what a horridly racist organization it has been from the beginning.

Another article these people hate is this one:
https://watchmanvlds.blogspot.com/2014/12/mormonism-racist-religion.html
It again PROVES the racism of the LDS. A link included in that post directs a person to the pdf version of a book I have on my shelf, "Mormonism and the Negro," by John J. Stewart. It is about OFFICIAL LDS doctrine in regards to negroes.

All one has to do is to click on the label "racism" on the side panel and it will take you to a whole lot of information proving the OFFICIAL racist position of the LDS.

The author of that post you linked to thinks that showing racist teachings in the Christian church (which I proved is NOT official Christian teaching) some how mitigates the blatant OFFICIAL racism of the LDS. And, yes, there were so-called Christians who used the "curse of Ham" and "curse of Cain" for their false teachings on racism, which actually proves that the LDS is not true, because if it was a true faith they would KNOW that these false Christian teachings were wrong rather than adopting them; after all they had direct lines with God who wouldn't let their prophet teach falsely, now would he?

The Bible teaches Christians to expose false teachings/teachers. Exposing such is not hatred. There is no "Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ" as that author claims, rather the LDS "gospel" is what Paul calls "another gospel." (Gal.1:8)